BLOG ARCHIVESBLOG ARCHIVES
VIEW OUR APPSVIEW OUR APPS

Oklahoma’s Government Workforce is the Ninth “Most Productive” in 2013

Jul 01, 2015


There are two major elements to look at when examining a state’s government workforce—the number of employees and the level of their pay. Each element is measured relative to the national average and summed together to obtain an overall measure of workforce productivity. By this metric, Oklahoma has the ninth most productive state and local government workforce in the country.


#Oklahoma has the 9th most productive S&L #government workforce in the country. (click to tweet)


As shown in Chart 1, for state and local government employment, Oklahoma ranks significantly above the national average with 22 employees for every 100 employees in the private sector which is 34 percent above the national average of 16.4 and is the 5th highest ratio in the country.


Chart 1 Oklahoma State and Local Government Employees per 100 Private Sector Employees Rank 2013.jpg


However, as shown in Chart 2, for state and local government compensation, Oklahoma ranks very low with government employees earning -3 percent less than those in the private sector—this is below the national average of 13 percent and is the 6th lowest compensation ratio in the country.


Chart 2 Oklahoma State and Local Government Compensation as a Percent of the Private Sector Rank 2013.jpg


Both wages and salaries and benefits contribute to Oklahoma’s low government compensation ratio. As shown in Chart 3, for state and local wages and salaries, Oklahoma employees earn -13 percent less than those in the private sector—this is the 10th lowest wages and salaries ratio in the country and below than the national average of -8 percent.




Chart 3 Oklahoma State and Local Government Wages and Salaries as a Percent of the Private Sector Rank 2013.jpg


As shown in Chart 4, for state and local benefits (pensions, health insurance, etc.), Oklahoma employees earn 45 percent more than those in the private sector which is a whopping -62 percent lower than the national average of 117 percent and is the 5th lowest benefit ratio in the country.


Chart 4 Oklahoma State and Local Government Benefits as a Percent of the Private Sector Rank 2013.jpg


Of course, efficiency for local government is more usefully measured on a more local scale. As such, we have also calculated the employment and compensations ratios of local government workers for every county in Oklahoma.




The Oklahoma counties with the highest local government employment ratios include: Cotton County (146.8), Love County (137.9), and Cherokee County (91.5). The Oklahoma counties with the lowest local government employment ratios include: Oklahoma County (7.2), Tulsa County (7.9), and Beckham County (7.9).


The Oklahoma counties with the highest local government compensation ratios include: Cherokee County (53 percent), Love County (45 percent), and Jackson County (41 percent). The Oklahoma counties with the lowest local government compensation ratios include: Grant County (-34 percent), Alfalfa (-33 percent), and Dewey County (-31 percent).


Note: Oklahoma has a significant Indian population and they run many businesses, especially casinos. Since most of these businesses are tribally owned, they are counted as local government employees in this data.


Overall, Oklahoma’s government workforce has a duel personality with a very high employment ratio, but also a very low compensation ratio—thanks to the low wages and salaries and benefits ratio. Fortunately, the low compensation ratio carries more weight resulting in the good government workforce metric.


Click here to view our full government workforce data app with details by state, by county, level of government, and over time.



J. Scott Moody

Scott has nearly 20 years of experience as a public policy economist. He is the author, co-author and editor of over 180 studies and books. His professional experience also includes positions at the American Conservative Union Foundation, Granite Institute, Federalism In Action, Maine Heritage Policy Center, Tax Foundation, and Heritage Foundation.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Check Out Our Unique Apps:

U.S. Capitol.jpg

Government Workforce

Tax Squeeze.jpg

Tax Burden

Strings Attached to Federal Dollars.jpg

Federal Tax and Spend

Hundred Dollar Bill.jpg

Cost of Living (COLI)

Baby.JPG

Demographic

Measuring a Dollar.jpg

Federal Tax & COLI

Retired.jpg

Federal Pension

United States Office of Personnel Management Seal.jpg

Federal Payroll

Check Out All Posts For Your State:

Alabama.jpg  Alabama

Alaska.jpg  Alaska   

Arizona.jpg   Arizona 

Arkansas.jpg  Arkansas

California.jpg  California

Colorado.jpg  Colorado

Connecticut.jpg  Connecticut

 Delaware.jpg  Delaware

Florida.jpg  Florida

 Georgia.jpg  Georgia

Hawaii.jpg  Hawaii

  Idaho.jpg  Idaho

   Illinois.jpg  Illinois

   Indiana.jpg  Indiana

  Iowa.jpg  Iowa

  Kansas.jpg  Kansas

  Kentucky.jpg  Kentucky

   Louisiana.jpg  Louisiana

   Maine.jpg  Maine

  Maryland.jpg  Maryland

Massachusetts.jpg  Massachusetts

Michigan.jpg  Michigan

Minnesota.jpg  Minnesota

  Mississippi.jpg  Mississippi

Missouri.jpg  Missouri

Montana.jpg  Montana

Nebraska.jpg  Nebraska

Nevada.jpg  Nevada

New Hampshire.jpg  New Hampshire

New Jersey.jpg  New Jersey

New Mexico.jpg  New Mexico

New York.jpg  New York

North Carolina.jpg  North Carolina

North Dakota.jpg  North Dakota

Ohio.jpg  Ohio

Oklahoma.jpg  Oklahoma

Oregon.jpg  Oregon

Pennsylvania.jpg  Pennsylvania

Rhode Island.jpg  Rhode Island

South Carolina.jpg  South Carolina

South Dakota.jpg  South Dakota

Tennessee.jpg  Tennessee

Texas.jpg  Texas

Utah.jpg  Utah

Vermont.jpg  Vermont

Virginia.jpg  Virginia

Washington.jpg  Washington

West Virginia.jpg  West Virginia

Wisconsin.jpg  Wisconsin

Wyoming.jpg  Wyoming