Vermont has the Seventh Highest Tax Burden in the Nation for 2015

Jun 15, 2017

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, Vermont collected $3.6 billion in state and local taxes. While this is an impressive sum of money, it tells us little about whether or not the average Vermont taxpayer can afford this level of taxation.



Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2015


As shown in Chart 1, Vermont’s state and local tax burden (tax collections divided by private sector personal income) was the seventh highest in the nation for FY 2015 at 17.9 percent—or 24 percent above the national average of 14.4 percent.


Chart 1 Vermont State and Local Tax Burden FY 2015.jpg


#VT #taxburden in FY 2015 was the 7th highest in the nation at 17.9%— 24% above U.S. average @keypolicydata #VTpoli (click to tweet)


As shown in Chart 2, Vermont’s tax burden has increased over time by 61 percent to 17.9 percent in FY 2015 from 11.1 percent in FY 1950.


Chart 2 Vermont Tax Burden by Type of Tax FY 1950 to 2015.JPG


#Vermont #taxburden has increased 61% between FY 1950 to 2015 to 17.9% from 11.1% @keypolicydata #VTpoli #VTleg (click to tweet)


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2015


As shown in Chart 3, Vermont’s 17.9 percent tax burden is greater than these combined industries: manufacturing (11 percent), accommodations and food services (4.4 percent), and transportation and warehousing (2 percent).


Chart 3 Vermont State and Local Tax Burden vs. Major Industry FY 2015.JPG


#VT #taxburden > combined industries: manufacturing, accommodations, and transportation @keypolicydata #VTpoli #VTleg (click to tweet)


One cannot talk about Vermont’s high tax burden without mentioning property taxes. Vermont has the 2nd highest state and local property tax burden in the country. In large part because Vermont relies so heavily on the property tax. In fact, state and local property tax collections make up 43 percent of all tax collections—the 5th highest percentage in the country.


Vermont’s property tax system is also unique in that it now mostly resides at the state level. In FY 2015, the state property tax raised 68 percent of the total ($1 billion at the state level vs. $496 million at the local level). This is due to Act 60 (Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1997 (pdf)) which mandated a uniform state-wide property tax in order to “equalize” access to education.


So far Act 60 has certainly resulted in a tax shift to the state from local government, but whether it has resulted in an overall higher and/or lower property tax burden (all else being equal) needs more study. Does anyone know of a good study on this question? If so, please leave a comment below.


On the other hand, Vermont compensates for a high property tax burden with a low sales tax burden of 1.9 percent—the 8th lowest in the country (4th lowest if you exclude the 4 states with no sales tax). However, this may not all be by choice. Rather, it may be a rational response to the fact that neighboring New Hampshire is one of those states without a sales tax.



This dynamic has created a situation where Vermont taxpayers can arbitrage the sales tax differential in their favor through cross-border shopping in New Hampshire. In fact, Dr. Art Woolf found in a recent study on Vermonters cross-border shopping that (pdf):


If the level of retail sales per person had remained identical in the two border areas, which it was in the years before Vermont implemented its sales tax, Vermont’s border communities would have had $540 million more in retail sales in 2007 and 3,000 more retail jobs. This would have contributed to healthier, more vibrant, communities and downtowns.


As such, Vermont’s low sales tax burden may not be solely due to a statutorily limited sales tax, but rather that a significant portion of taxable sales has already shifted across the border into New Hampshire. Of course, it is a chicken-and-egg problem. Perhaps Vermont’s sales tax is statutorily limited because policymakers know that it will drive more taxable sales into New Hampshire—so why bother making the tax bigger.


Whichever the case, taxes matter!


Of course, the tax burdens for local government can vary just as much as they do among the 50 states. As such, we have also calculated the local government tax burden for every county in Vermont—this includes every taxing jurisdiction within the geographic county borders whether it is a city, a special district, or county government itself.


Vermont only has 14 counties and are listed below from highest to lowest local government tax burden:


  • Windham County, VT (3.7 percent)
  • Essex County, VT (3.6 percent)
  • Orleans County, VT (3.5 percent)
  • Rutland County, VT (3.3 percent)
  • Windsor County, VT (2.9 percent)
  • Grand Isle County, VT (2.8 percent)
  • Caledonia County, VT (2.8 percent)
  • Lamoille County, VT (2.7 percent)
  • Washington County, VT (2.6 percent)
  • Bennington County, VT (2.5 percent)
  • Orange County, VT (2.4 percent)
  • Chittenden County, VT (2.2 percent)
  • Addison County, VT (2.2 percent)
  • Franklin County, VT (2 percent)


Chart 4 Vermont Local Tax Burden by County FY 2015.JPG


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2015



Finally, don’t forget to watch our exclusive time-lapse video of state and local tax burdens over the last 65 years! See if your state has been above or below the national average?



Category: Tax Burdens

J. Scott Moody

Scott has nearly 20 years of experience as a public policy economist. He is the author, co-author and editor of over 180 studies and books. His professional experience also includes positions at the American Conservative Union Foundation, Granite Institute, Federalism In Action, Maine Heritage Policy Center, Tax Foundation, and Heritage Foundation.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Stay Up-To-Date on Your State's Key Policy Data - Economics, Politics, Demographics - by Joining Our Mailing List Today!

Check Out Our Unique Apps:

U.S. Capitol.jpg

Government Workforce

Tax Squeeze.jpg

Tax Burden

Strings Attached to Federal Dollars.jpg

Federal Tax and Spend

Hundred Dollar Bill.jpg

Cost of Living (COLI)



Measuring a Dollar.jpg

Federal Tax & COLI


Federal Pension

United States Office of Personnel Management Seal.jpg

Federal Payroll

Check out more

Stories from our

Media Partner:

Check Out All Posts For Your State:

Alabama.jpg  Alabama

Alaska.jpg  Alaska   

Arizona.jpg   Arizona 

Arkansas.jpg  Arkansas

California.jpg  California

Colorado.jpg  Colorado

Connecticut.jpg  Connecticut

 Delaware.jpg  Delaware

Florida.jpg  Florida

 Georgia.jpg  Georgia

Hawaii.jpg  Hawaii

  Idaho.jpg  Idaho

   Illinois.jpg  Illinois

   Indiana.jpg  Indiana

  Iowa.jpg  Iowa

  Kansas.jpg  Kansas

  Kentucky.jpg  Kentucky

   Louisiana.jpg  Louisiana

   Maine.jpg  Maine

  Maryland.jpg  Maryland

Massachusetts.jpg  Massachusetts

Michigan.jpg  Michigan

Minnesota.jpg  Minnesota

  Mississippi.jpg  Mississippi

Missouri.jpg  Missouri

Montana.jpg  Montana

Nebraska.jpg  Nebraska

Nevada.jpg  Nevada

New Hampshire.jpg  New Hampshire

New Jersey.jpg  New Jersey

New Mexico.jpg  New Mexico

New York.jpg  New York

North Carolina.jpg  North Carolina

North Dakota.jpg  North Dakota

Ohio.jpg  Ohio

Oklahoma.jpg  Oklahoma

Oregon.jpg  Oregon

Pennsylvania.jpg  Pennsylvania

Rhode Island.jpg  Rhode Island

South Carolina.jpg  South Carolina

South Dakota.jpg  South Dakota

Tennessee.jpg  Tennessee

Texas.jpg  Texas

Utah.jpg  Utah

Vermont.jpg  Vermont

Virginia.jpg  Virginia

Washington.jpg  Washington

West Virginia.jpg  West Virginia

Wisconsin.jpg  Wisconsin

Wyoming.jpg  Wyoming