There are two major elements to look at when examining a state’s state and local government workforce—the number of employees and the level of their pay. In this analysis, each element is measured relative to the national average and summed together to obtain an overall measure of workforce productivity. Based on this state and local government workforce productivity index, Utah has the thirteenth most productive state and local government workforce in the country.
In 2016, #Utah had the 13th most productive state and local #government workforce in the country http://bit.ly/2BDEhpN @keypolicydata #UTpol #UTleg #UTsen #UTgov (click to tweet)
As shown in Chart 1, for state and local government employment in 2016, Utah employed 16.2 employees for every 100 employees in the private sector (employment ratio) which is 3 percent above the national average of 15.7 and is the 24th lowest ratio in the country.
In 2016, #Utah state & local #government employed 16.2 for every 100 employed in private sector—the 24th lowest ratio in the country and 3% above US average of 15.7 http://bit.ly/2BDEhpN @keypolicydata #UTpol #UTleg #UTsen #UTgov (click to tweet)
Additionally, Utah’s employment ratio has been decreasing. As shown in Chart 2, between 1969 and 2016, the employment ratio decreased by -27 percent to 16.2 in 2016 from 22.2 in 1969. This is in contrast to the national average which increased by 2 percent to 15.7 in 2016 from 15.4 in 1969.
As shown in Chart 3, for state and local government compensation in 2016, government employees earned 6 percent more than those in the private sector (compensation ratio) which is 59 percent lower than the national average of 14 percent and is the 14th lowest compensation ratio in the country.
In 2016, #Utah state & local #government compensation was 6% higher than in the private sector—the 14th lowest ratio in the country and 59% below US average of 14% http://bit.ly/2BDEhpN @keypolicydata #UTpol #UTleg #UTsen #UTgov (click to tweet)
Additionally, Utah’s compensation ratio has been increasing. As shown in Chart 4, between 1969 and 2016, the compensation ratio increased by 6 percentage points to 6 percent in 2016 from 0 percent in 1969. This is in contrast to the national average which increased by 15 percentage points to 14 percent in 2016 from -1 percent in 1969.
As shown in Chart 5, both wages and salaries and benefits contribute to Utah’s lower than average government compensation ratio. For state and local wages and salaries in 2016, Utah employees earn -13 percent less than those in the private sector which is the 12th lowest wages and salaries ratio in the country and significantly lower than the national average of -8 percent.
For state and local benefits in 2016, Utah employees earn 96 percent more than those in the private sector which is -24 percent lower than the national average of 127 percent and is the 18th lowest benefit ratio in the country.
Of course, efficiency for local government helps to be measured on a more local scale. As such, we have also calculated the employment and compensations ratios of local government workers for every county in Utah.
The Utah local government employment ratios are (from highest to lowest, state average is 10.1):
The Utah local government compensation ratios are (from highest to lowest, state average is -8 percent):
Overall, it is Utah’s lower than average compensation ratio, driven by both low wages and salaries and benefits, that is responsible for Utah having the 13th best state and local government workforce productivity index.
Read more about the "government workforce productivity Index" methodology here.
Finally, don’t forget to watch our exclusive time-lapse video of our state and local government workforce productivity index over the last 47 years! See if your state has been above or below the national average?
Scott has nearly 20 years of experience as a public policy economist. He is the author, co-author and editor of over 180 studies and books. His professional experience also includes positions at the American Conservative Union Foundation, Granite Institute, Federalism In Action, Maine Heritage Policy Center, Tax Foundation, and Heritage Foundation.