Alaska has the Lowest State and Local Tax Burden in the Nation for FY 2016

Apr 10, 2018

Print Friendly and PDF

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, Alaska collected $1.3 billion in state and local taxes (net of Permanent Fund Distributions)—or $1,739 for every  man, woman, and child. While this is an impressive sum of money, it tells us little about whether or not the Alaskan taxpayers can afford this level of taxation?


To better answer this question, this analysis will calculate Alaska’s tax burden relative to the private sector. Ultimately, it is the private sector that creates new wealth and income. A high tax burden means a state is hobbling its private sector relative to other states and reducing their long-run economic growth potential.




Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016


Fortunately for taxpayers, as shown in Chart 1, Alaska’s state and local tax burden (tax collections divided by private sector personal income) was the lowest in the nation for 2016 at 4.9 percent—or -66 percent below the national average of 14.3 percent.


Chart 1 Alaska State and Local Tax Burden FY 2016.jpg


#Alaska state and local #taxburden in FY 2016 was the lowest in the nation at 4.9%— -66% below US average of 14.3% @keypolicydata #AKpol #AKleg #AKgov #AKpol #AKsenate #PolicyData (click to tweet)


As shown in Chart 2, the tax burden has declined over time by -49 percent to 4.9 percent in FY 2016 from 9.7 percent in FY 1959 (when Alaska joined the United States as a state). Alaska depends critically on severance taxes which have dropped precipitously—falling -94 percent since 2012 to $336 million from $5.8 billion.


Chart 2 Alaska State and Local Tax Burden by Type of Tax FY 1950 to 2016.JPG


#Alaska state and local #taxburden has declined -49 percent between FY 1959 (9.7%) to 2016 (4.9%) @keypolicydata #AKpol #AKleg #AKgov #AKpol #AKsenate #PolicyData (click to tweet)


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016


To put Alaska’s tax burden into perspective, let’s compare it to size of major industries in the state (as a percent of private sector income). As shown in Chart 3, Alaska’s 6.2 percent tax burden is greater than these combined industries: manufacturing (3.9 percent), and educational services (0.6 percent)


Chart 3 Alaska State and Local Tax Burden vs. Major Industry FY 2016.JPG


#Alaska state and local #taxburden = combined industries: manufacturing and educational services @keypolicydata #AKpol #AKleg #AKgov #AKpol #AKsenate #PolicyData (click to tweet)


Alaska’s severance taxes fuel their Permanent Fund enshrined in their constitution in 1976. An annual dividend is paid to every resident in Alaska from the Permanent Fund. Over the years, as shown in Chart 4, the dividend has fluctuated from a low of $331.29 in 1984 to a high of $3,269 in 2008 (including one-time Alaska Resource Rebate). In 2017, the dividend was worth $1,200 for every man, woman and child based on a total disbursement of $673 million.


Chart 4 Alaska Permanent Fund Distributions 1982 to 2017.JPG


The existence of the dividend poses an interesting public policy question—should the dividend be considered as the equivalent of a tax reduction? In our analysis, we assume the dividend is a functional tax reduction. This allows better apples-to-apples comparisons with other states’ sovereign wealth funds that put proceeds in the General Fund—which, all else being equal, would lower tax burdens. Note that in years of very high disbursements, state level tax burdens may show as a negative as a result.


High severance taxes also pose another problem in that they are generally considered by economist to be fully passed onto the consumer in the form of higher prices. As a result, much of the severance tax burden is actually “exported” to the other 49 states. The tax burden analysis published by the Tax Foundation adjusts for this impact and ranks Alaska as the lowest in the country with a tax burden of 6.5 percent of income.


While “tax exporting” is an important economic consideration, policymakers need to be aware of the size of tax collections relative to the private sector economy. Tax exporting may mean lower tax burdens in the short-run, but tax exporting is not a costless transaction as it creates distortions in the economy in the long-run. As such, the tax burdens estimates shown here at Key Policy Data and those published by the Tax Foundation are both useful to policymakers.


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016


Finally, don’t forget to watch our exclusive time-lapse video of state and local tax burdens over the last 66 years! See if your state has been above or below the national average?





Category: Tax Burdens

J. Scott Moody

Scott has nearly 20 years of experience as a public policy economist. He is the author, co-author and editor of over 180 studies and books. His professional experience also includes positions at the American Conservative Union Foundation, Granite Institute, Federalism In Action, Maine Heritage Policy Center, Tax Foundation, and Heritage Foundation.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Stay Up-To-Date on Your State's Key Policy Data - Economics, Politics, Demographics - by Joining Our Mailing List Today!

Check Out Our Unique Apps:

U.S. Capitol.jpg

Government Workforce

Tax Squeeze.jpg

Tax Burden

Strings Attached to Federal Dollars.jpg

Federal Tax and Spend

Hundred Dollar Bill.jpg

Cost of Living (COLI)



Measuring a Dollar.jpg

Federal Tax & COLI


Federal Pension

United States Office of Personnel Management Seal.jpg

Federal Payroll

Check out more

Stories from our

Media Partner:

Check Out All Posts For Your State:

Alabama.jpg  Alabama

Alaska.jpg  Alaska   

Arizona.jpg   Arizona 

Arkansas.jpg  Arkansas

California.jpg  California

Colorado.jpg  Colorado

Connecticut.jpg  Connecticut

 Delaware.jpg  Delaware

Florida.jpg  Florida

 Georgia.jpg  Georgia

Hawaii.jpg  Hawaii

  Idaho.jpg  Idaho

   Illinois.jpg  Illinois

   Indiana.jpg  Indiana

  Iowa.jpg  Iowa

  Kansas.jpg  Kansas

  Kentucky.jpg  Kentucky

   Louisiana.jpg  Louisiana

   Maine.jpg  Maine

  Maryland.jpg  Maryland

Massachusetts.jpg  Massachusetts

Michigan.jpg  Michigan

Minnesota.jpg  Minnesota

  Mississippi.jpg  Mississippi

Missouri.jpg  Missouri

Montana.jpg  Montana

Nebraska.jpg  Nebraska

Nevada.jpg  Nevada

New Hampshire.jpg  New Hampshire

New Jersey.jpg  New Jersey

New Mexico.jpg  New Mexico

New York.jpg  New York

North Carolina.jpg  North Carolina

North Dakota.jpg  North Dakota

Ohio.jpg  Ohio

Oklahoma.jpg  Oklahoma

Oregon.jpg  Oregon

Pennsylvania.jpg  Pennsylvania

Rhode Island.jpg  Rhode Island

South Carolina.jpg  South Carolina

South Dakota.jpg  South Dakota

Tennessee.jpg  Tennessee

Texas.jpg  Texas

Utah.jpg  Utah

Vermont.jpg  Vermont

Virginia.jpg  Virginia

Washington.jpg  Washington

West Virginia.jpg  West Virginia

Wisconsin.jpg  Wisconsin

Wyoming.jpg  Wyoming