Connecticut has the Twenty-First Lowest State and Local Tax Burden in the Nation for FY 2016

Jun 25, 2018

Print Friendly and PDF

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, Connecticut collected $25.8 billion in state and local taxes—or $7,205 for every man, woman, and child. While this is an impressive sum of money, it tells us little about whether or not the average Connecticut taxpayer can afford this level of taxation?


To better answer this question, this analysis will calculate Connecticut’s tax burden relative to the private sector. Ultimately, it is the private sector that creates new wealth and income. A high tax burden means a state is hobbling its private sector relative to other states and reducing their long-run economic growth potential.



Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016


As shown in Chart 1, Connecticut’s state and local tax burden (tax collections divided by private sector personal income) was the twenty-first lowest in the nation for FY 2016 at 13.5 percent—or -6 percent below the national average of 14.3 percent.


Chart 1 Connecticut State and Local Tax Burden FY 2016.jpg


#Connecticut state and local #taxburden in FY 2016 was the 21st lowest in the nation at 13.5%— -6% below US average of 14.3% @keypolicydata #CTpol #CTleg #CTsen #CTgov #PolicyData (click to tweet)


As shown in Chart 2, Connecticut’s tax burden has increased over time by 83 percent to 13.5 percent in FY 2016 from 7.3 percent in FY 1950.


Chart 2 Connecticut State and Local Tax Burden by Type of Tax FY 1950 to 2016.JPG


#Connecticut state and local #taxburden has increased 83% between FY 1950 (7.3%) to 2016 (13.5%) @keypolicydata #CTpol #CTleg #CTsen #CTgov #PolicyData (click to tweet)


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016



To put Connecticut’s tax burden into perspective, let’s compare it to size of major industries in the state (as a percent of private sector income). As shown in Chart 3, Connecticut’s 13.3 percent tax burden is greater than these combined industries: manufacturing (10.3 percent) and educational services (2.5 percent).


Chart 3 Connecticut State and Local Tax Burden vs. Major Industry FY 2016.JPG


#Connecticut state and local #taxburden > manufacturing and educational services @keypolicydata #CTpol #CTleg #CTsen #CTgov #PolicyData (click to tweet)


Connecticut’s lower than average tax burden is driven by a low sales tax burden (2 percent, 10th lowest), and all other tax burden (1.4 percent, 4th lowest). This is partially offset by a high property tax burden (5.4 percent, 10th highest), and individual income tax burden (3.9 percent, 13th highest).

Any discussion of Connecticut’s tax burden since 1950 would be incomplete without mentioning the saga of the individual income tax. For most of this time-period, Connecticut had no, or very small, individual income tax. It wasn’t until 1991 that the income tax exploded growing by a whopping 477 percent to 3.9 percent in FY 2016 from a mere 0.7 percent in FY 1991.


If Connecticut had never enacted an individual income tax, their tax burden would have been 9.5 percent in FY 2016 and ranked as the second lowest in the country. Adding insult to injury, the economic results from such a dramatic increase in the tax burden have been dismal. A recent Forbes article on Connecticut’s income tax found depressing economic results:


“Connecticut’s downhill slide seems to have speeded up after 1990. That year, former Connecticut Senator Lowell P. Weicker Jr. campaigned for the governorship by vowing to resolve the state’s financial problems without introducing an income tax. After he was elected, he revealed his true colors and signed an income tax into law. Perhaps some Ivy League arrogance (Weicker went to Yale) impaired his ability to understand how incentives like lower taxes stimulate enterprising spirits.”


“The income tax failed to achieve the wonders Weicker claimed. By siphoning more money out of the private sector, the Connecticut income tax reduced the amount of money available for private sector hiring and reduced the amount of money available for consumer spending. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reported, “no other state in the country has had such stagnation of employment.”


More proof that taxes matter . . . Connecticut should think of reducing taxes in order to jumpstart their anemic economy.



f course, the tax burdens for local government can vary just as much as they do among the 50 states. As such, we have also calculated the local government tax burden for every county in Connecticut—this includes every taxing jurisdiction within the geographic county borders whether it is a city, a special district, or county government itself.


Connecticut has 8 counties and their local government tax burden are shown below (from highest to lowest):


  • New London County, CT (7.2 percent)
  • New Haven County, CT (7.2 percent)
  • Hartford County, CT (6.8 percent)
  • Middlesex County, CT (6.2 percent)
  • Windham County, CT (6.2 percent)
  • Litchfield County, CT (6.2 percent)
  • Tolland County, CT (6.0 percent)
  • Fairfield County, CT (4.0 percent)


Chart 4 Connecticut Local Tax Burden by County FY 2016.JPG 


Click here to view tax burden data by state, type of tax, and for years 1950 to 2016


Finally, don’t forget to watch our exclusive time-lapse video of state and local tax burdens over the last 66 years! See if your state has been above or below the national average?







Category: Tax Burdens

J. Scott Moody

Scott has nearly 20 years of experience as a public policy economist. He is the author, co-author and editor of over 180 studies and books. His professional experience also includes positions at the American Conservative Union Foundation, Granite Institute, Federalism In Action, Maine Heritage Policy Center, Tax Foundation, and Heritage Foundation.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Stay Up-To-Date on Your State's Key Policy Data - Economics, Politics, Demographics - by Joining Our Mailing List Today!

Check Out Our Unique Apps:

U.S. Capitol.jpg

Government Workforce

Tax Squeeze.jpg

Tax Burden

Strings Attached to Federal Dollars.jpg

Federal Tax and Spend

Hundred Dollar Bill.jpg

Cost of Living (COLI)



Measuring a Dollar.jpg

Federal Tax & COLI


Federal Pension

United States Office of Personnel Management Seal.jpg

Federal Payroll

Check out more

Stories from our

Media Partner:

Check Out All Posts For Your State:

Alabama.jpg  Alabama

Alaska.jpg  Alaska   

Arizona.jpg   Arizona 

Arkansas.jpg  Arkansas

California.jpg  California

Colorado.jpg  Colorado

Connecticut.jpg  Connecticut

 Delaware.jpg  Delaware

Florida.jpg  Florida

 Georgia.jpg  Georgia

Hawaii.jpg  Hawaii

  Idaho.jpg  Idaho

   Illinois.jpg  Illinois

   Indiana.jpg  Indiana

  Iowa.jpg  Iowa

  Kansas.jpg  Kansas

  Kentucky.jpg  Kentucky

   Louisiana.jpg  Louisiana

   Maine.jpg  Maine

  Maryland.jpg  Maryland

Massachusetts.jpg  Massachusetts

Michigan.jpg  Michigan

Minnesota.jpg  Minnesota

  Mississippi.jpg  Mississippi

Missouri.jpg  Missouri

Montana.jpg  Montana

Nebraska.jpg  Nebraska

Nevada.jpg  Nevada

New Hampshire.jpg  New Hampshire

New Jersey.jpg  New Jersey

New Mexico.jpg  New Mexico

New York.jpg  New York

North Carolina.jpg  North Carolina

North Dakota.jpg  North Dakota

Ohio.jpg  Ohio

Oklahoma.jpg  Oklahoma

Oregon.jpg  Oregon

Pennsylvania.jpg  Pennsylvania

Rhode Island.jpg  Rhode Island

South Carolina.jpg  South Carolina

South Dakota.jpg  South Dakota

Tennessee.jpg  Tennessee

Texas.jpg  Texas

Utah.jpg  Utah

Vermont.jpg  Vermont

Virginia.jpg  Virginia

Washington.jpg  Washington

West Virginia.jpg  West Virginia

Wisconsin.jpg  Wisconsin

Wyoming.jpg  Wyoming